4.7 Article

Microtubules regulate brush border formation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 233, Issue 2, Pages 1468-1480

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.26033

Keywords

actin; brush border; epithelial polarity; microtubules; MTOC

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [R01-DK075555, R01-DK095811, R01-DK106228, R01-GM078373]
  2. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas [PIP0287]
  3. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PICT2012-2198]
  4. Argentina Government [Bec.Ar]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most epithelial cells contain apical membrane structures associated to bundles of actin filaments, which constitute the brush border. Whereas microtubule participation in the maintenance of the brush border identity has been characterized, their contribution to de novo microvilli organization remained elusive. Hereby, using a cell model of individual enterocyte polarization, we found that nocodazole induced microtubule depolymerization prevented the de novo brush border formation. Microtubule participation in brush border actin organization was confirmed in polarized kidney tubule MDCK cells. We also found that centrosome, but not Golgi derived microtubules, were essential for the initial stages of brush border development. During this process, microtubule plus ends acquired an early asymmetric orientation toward the apical membrane, which clearly differs from their predominant basal orientation in mature epithelia. In addition, overexpression of the microtubule plus ends associated protein CLIP170, which regulate actin nucleation in different cell contexts, facilitated brush border formation. In combination, the present results support the participation of centrosomal microtubule plus ends in the activation of the polarized actin organization associated to brush border formation, unveiling a novel mechanism of microtubule regulation of epithelial polarity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available