4.7 Article

Giant fractional Shapiro steps in anisotropic Josephson junction arrays

Journal

COMMUNICATIONS PHYSICS
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42005-020-0315-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Flemish Science Foundation [G0B5315N]
  2. FundacAo de Amparo a Ciencia e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco (FACEPE) [APQ-0198-1.05/14]
  3. CoordenacAao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  4. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  5. COST action NanoCoHybri [CA16218]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Giant fractional Shapiro steps have been observed in Josephson junction arrays as resulting from magnetic flux quantization in the two-dimensional array. We demonstrate experimentally the appearance of giant fractional Shapiro steps in anisotropic Josephson junction arrays as unambiguous evidence of a skewed current phase relationship. Introducing anisotropy in the array results in a giant collective high frequency response that reflects the properties of a single junction, as evidenced by the observation of a Fraunhofer like magnetic field dependence of the total critical current of the system. The observed phase dynamics can be perfectly captured within an extended resistively shunted Josephson junction model. These results directly indicate the potential of Josephson junction arrays to explore the current phase relation in a very broad frequency range (down to 50 MHz) and in a wide variety of novel link materials exhibiting non-conventional current phase relationships. Giant fractional Shapiro steps have been observed in Josephson junction arrays as resulting from magnetic flux quantization in the two-dimensional array. Here, the authors demonstrate the observation of giant fractional Shapiro steps in an anisotropic Josephson junction array, as unambiguous evidence of a skewed current phase relationship.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available