4.7 Article

Lead-free antiferroelectric: xCaZrO(3)-(1-x)NaNbO3 system (0 <= x <= 0.10)

Journal

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
Volume 44, Issue 23, Pages 10763-10772

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4dt03919j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Taiyo Yuden Corporation - Visiting Scientist Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates that antiferroelectricity can be stabilized in NaNbO3 (NN) based ceramics by lowering the tolerance factor. Through consideration of the crystal chemistry via the Goldschmidt tolerance factor and polarizability, we show that simultaneous substitution of Zr4+ and Ca2+ ions in the Nb and Na sites, respectively, lowers the polarizability and tolerance factor of the (Na1-xCax)(Nb1-xZrx)O-3 (CZNN100x) solid solution, while maintaining charge neutrality. Structural investigations using both X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) indicated an enhancement of antiferroelectric (AFE) superlattice peaks with CaZrO3 substitution. The TEM domain analysis revealed that only AFE domains existed in the CZNN4 and CZNN5 ceramics; in contrast, normal NN ceramics displayed coexistence of AFE and ferroelectric (FE) domains at room temperature. The CZNN100x (0.02 <= x <= 0.05) ceramics showed double polarization hysteresis loops, characteristic of reversible AFE <-> FE phase transition switching. The field-induced polarization decreased drastically with increasing substitution, an effect of the decreases in tolerance factor. In addition, the AFE switching field was increased by the chemical substitution. First principles calculations are performed to obtain insights into the relative stability and coexistence of the AFE and FE phases in single domains. The large decrease of polarization in the CZNN system is explained by a modification of the relative stability of the relevant structures, which favours nonpolar-to-polar AFE transitions over polar-to-polar FE domain switching.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available