4.7 Article

Plk4 and Aurora A cooperate in the initiation of acentriolar spindle assembly in mammalian oocytes

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 216, Issue 11, Pages 3571-3590

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201606077

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK research studentship from Cambridge Cancer Centre
  2. Cancer Research UK program [C3/A18795]
  3. North West Cancer Research [CR1037, CR1088]
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/M012557/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Cancer Research UK [18795] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [G120/1030] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. BBSRC [BB/M012557/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. MRC [G120/1030] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Establishing the bipolar spindle in mammalian oocytes after their prolonged arrest is crucial for meiotic fidelity and subsequent development. In contrast to somatic cells, the first meiotic spindle assembles in the absence of centriole-containing centrosomes. Ran-GTP can promote microtubule nucleation near chromatin, but additional unidentified factors are postulated for the activity of multiple acentriolar microtubule organizing centers in the oocyte. We now demonstrate that partially overlapping, nonredundant functions of Aurora A and Plk4 kinases contribute to initiate acentriolar meiosis I spindle formation. Loss of microtubule nucleation after simultaneous chemical inhibition of both kinases can be significantly rescued by drug-resistant Aurora A alone. Drug-resistant Plk4 can enhance Aurora A-mediated rescue, and, accordingly, Plk4 can phosphorylate and potentiate the activity of Aurora A in vitro. Both kinases function distinctly from Ran, which amplifies microtubule growth. We conclude that Aurora A and Plk4 are rate-limiting factors contributing to microtubule growth as the acentriolar oocyte resumes meiosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available