4.7 Article

Three-tier regulation of cell number plasticity by neurotrophins and Tolls in Drosophila

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 216, Issue 5, Pages 1421-1438

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201607098

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [094175/Z/10/Z, 088583/Z/09/Z]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L008343/1]
  3. Medical Research Council
  4. Marie Sklodowska Curie-Actions Intra-European Fellowship (Kon-TikiGEN ET)
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L008343/1, 1375223] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. BBSRC [BB/L008343/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Wellcome Trust [094175/Z/10/Z, 088583/Z/09/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cell number plasticity is coupled to circuitry in the nervous system, adjusting cell mass to functional requirements. In mammals, this is achieved by neurotrophin (NT) ligands, which promote cell survival via their Trk and p75NTR receptors and cell death via p75NTR and Sortilin. Drosophila NTs (DNTs) bind Toll receptors instead to promote neuronal survival, but whether they can also regulate cell death is unknown. In this study, we show that DNTs and Tolls can switch from promoting cell survival to death in the central nervous system (CNS) via a three-tier mechanism. First, DNT cleavage patterns result in alternative signaling outcomes. Second, different Tolls can preferentially promote cell survival or death. Third, distinct adaptors downstream of Tolls can drive either apoptosis or cell survival. Toll-6 promotes cell survival via MyD88-NF-kappa B and cell death via Wek-Sarm-JNK. The distribution of adaptors changes in space and time and may segregate to distinct neural circuits. This novel mechanism for CNS cell plasticity may operate in wider contexts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available