4.3 Article

Comparison of a new Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry biometer and a low-coherence reflectometry biometer

Journal

JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
Volume 43, Issue 11, Pages 1406-1412

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.016

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate the repeatability of a new biometer using Scheimpflug technology combined with partial coherence interferometry (PCI) (Pentacam AXL) and its agreement with a device based on optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR), the Allegro Biograph. Setting: Oftalvist Centro Integral Ocular Jerez, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain. Design: Evaluation of a diagnostic test. Methods: The mean keratometry (K), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and axial length (AL) were measured with the 2 devices 3 times by the same examiner in 2 groups (patients with cataract and patients without cataract). The repeatability was determined using the within-subject standard deviation, test-retest repeatability, coefficient of variation, and intraclass correlation coefficient. The correlation was evaluated with the Pearson coefficient and interchangeability with the Bland-Altman plot. Results: Eighty eyes (40 eyes in each group) of 80 patients were analyzed. Significant differences were found between the Scheimpflug-PCI device and the OLCR device for mean K in the normal group (P <.001) and for CCT in the normal group (P <.05) and the cataract group (P <.001). There were no differences between devices in ACD and AL in either group. The repeatability between devices was similar. 'Although a significant correlation between devices was found for all measurements (all P <.001), wide limits of agreement were found in both groups for all biometric parameters. Conclusions: The Scheimpflug-PCI and OLCR devices showed excellent intravisit repeatability and high correlation for mean K, CCT, ACD, and AL in healthy and cataractous eyes. No differences were found in AL; however, the 2 devices might not be interchangeable. (C) 2017 ASCRS and ESCRS

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available