4.3 Article

Secondary Hyperthyroidism due to an Ectopic Thyrotropin-Secreting Neuroendocrine Pituitary Tumor: A Case Report

Journal

EUROPEAN THYROID JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 106-112

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000505020

Keywords

Thyrotropin-secreting neuroendocrine pituitary tumors; Ectopic pituitary adenoma; Secondary hyperthyroidism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The main differential diagnoses of secondary hyperthyroidism include thyrotropin-secreting neuroendocrine pituitary tumors (TSH-PitNETs) and resistance to thyroid hormone. As a rare cause of secondary hyperthyroidism, ectopic thyrotropin-producing neuroendocrine pituitary tumors must also be considered. Case Presentation: A 48-year-old female patient with overt hyperthyroidism and elevated thyrotropin was admitted to the endocrine outpatient clinic of a secondary care hospital in March 2018. The patient had an inconspicuous pituitary MRI and F18-F-DOPA PET-CT, but showed a tumor mass located at the pharyngeal roof. Most biochemical tests and an increased tracer uptake of the pharyngeal mass in a Ga68-DOTANOC PET-CT argued for the presence of an ectopic TSH-PitNET. After treatment with octreotide over 5 days and a consecutive normalization of free thyroxine and free triiodothyronine, the tumor was endoscopically resected. Histologically, the mass consisted of small partially spindle, partially polygonal monomorphic to mildly pleomorphic cells with immunoreactivity for thyrotropin and luteinizing hormone. Postoperatively, the patient required intermittent levothyroxine therapy. Discussion and Conclusions: Ectopic TSH-PitNETs represent an extremely rare cause for secondary hyperthyroidism. While the diagnostic process may be complicated by negative imaging studies of the pituitary gland, family history, biochemical tests, and functional imaging using gallium-labelled somatostatin analogues may be helpful in establishing the diagnosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available