4.7 Article

Single-layer boron-doped graphene quantum dots for contrast-enhanced in vivo T1-weighted MRI

Journal

NANOSCALE HORIZONS
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 573-579

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9nh00608g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01CA161953, R01EB026890, F31CA232546]
  2. Kyocera Professorship Endowment
  3. Biomedical Research Shared Instrumentation Grant [S10RR029021]
  4. NSF [NNCI-1542101]
  5. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [F31CA232546]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gadolinium (Gd)-based chelates are used as clinical T-1 contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to their demonstrated high sensitivity and positive contrast enhancement capability. However, there has been an increasing safety concern about their use in medicine because of the toxicity of the metal ions released from these contrast agents when used in vivo. Although significant effort has been made in developing metal-free MRI contrast agents, none have matched the magnetic properties achieved by the gold standard clinical contrast agent, Gd diethylene penta-acetic acid (Gd-DTPA). Here, we report the development of a single-layer, boron-doped graphene quantum dot (termed SL-BGQD) that demonstrates better T-1 contrast enhancement than Gd-DTPA. The SL-BGQD is shown to provide significantly higher positive contrast enhancement than the Gd-DTPA contrast agent in imaging vital organs, including kidneys, liver, and spleen, and especially, vasculatures. Further, our results show that the SL-BQGD is able to bypass the blood-brain barrier and allows sustained imaging for at least one hour with a single injection. Hematological and histopathological analyses show that the SL-BGQD demonstrates a non-toxic profile in wild-type mice and may, therefore, serve as an improved, safer alternative to currently available clinical MRI contrast agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available