4.5 Article

Prognostic Importance of Novel Oxygen Desaturation Metrics in Patients With Heart Failure and Central Sleep Apnea

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 131-137

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2016.09.004

Keywords

Sleep; heart failure; hypoxia and mortality

Funding

  1. Suzuken Memorial Foundation
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [26461094, 23700544]
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health [R01HL065176]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23700544, 26461094] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Sleep-disordered breathing, particularly central sleep apnea (CSA), is highly prevalent in heart failure (HF) and an independent prognostic marker. We assessed the hypothesis that an increased hypoxemic burden during sleep may have greater prognostic value than the frequency of apneic and hypopneic episodes. Methods and Results: We prospectively conducted overnight cardiorespiratory polygraphy on consecutive HF patients referred to our hospital from 2008 to 2011. We studied CSA defined by an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of >= 5 events/h with >75% of all events being central in origin. We determined the AHI, proportion of the sleep time with SpO(2) <90% (T90%), and proportion of the recording time that 4% desaturation events occurred (4%POD). We studied 112 HF patients with either systolic or diastolic dysfunction. During a follow-up period of 37 +/- 25 months, 32 patients (29%) died. Nonsurvivors had a higher 4%POD compared with survivors (11 +/- 6.4% vs 19 +/- 13%; P=.001), but did not differ significantly from survivors regarding AHI and T90%. An adjusted logistic regression analysis revealed that the 4%POD was the best independent predictor of mortality. Conclusions: The 4%POD, a novel metric for the nocturnal hypoxemic burden, is an independent prognostic marker in HF patients affected by CSA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available