4.5 Article

Increased Secondary/Primary Bile Acid Ratio in Chronic Heart Failure

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages 666-671

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.06.007

Keywords

Chronic heart failure; gut microbiota; Bile acids profile; clinical outcome

Funding

  1. Norwegian Health Association [6782]
  2. Research Council of Norway [240787/F20]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Bile acids (BAs) are now recognized as signaling molecules and emerging evidence suggests that BAs affect cardiovascular function. The gut microbiota has recently been linked to the severity of heart failure (HF), and microbial metabolism has a major impact on BA homeostasis. We aimed to investigate the pattern of BAs, and particularly microbiota-transformed (secondary) BAs, in patients with chronic HF. Methods and Results: This was a prospective, observational, single-center study including 142 patients with chronic HF and 20 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects. We measured plasma levels of primary, secondary, and total BAs, and explored their associations with clinical characteristics and survival. Plasma levels of primary BAs were lower (P < .01) and the ratios of secondary to primary BAs higher (P < .001) in patients with HF compared with control subjects. Approximately 40% of patients in the upper tertile of the ratio of secondary to primary BAs died during 5.6 years of follow-up (unadjusted Cox regression: hazard ratio 1.93, 95% confidence interval 1.01-3.68, compared with the lower tertiles). However, this association was attenuated and no longer significant in multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Levels of primary BAs were reduced and specific secondary BAs increased in patients with chronic HF. This pattern was associated with reduced overall survival in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analyses. Future studies should assess the regulation and potential role of BA metabolism in HF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available