4.4 Article

The APOB rs693 polymorphism impacts the lipid profile of Brazilian older adults

Journal

Publisher

ASSOC BRAS DIVULG CIENTIFICA
DOI: 10.1590/1414-431X20199102

Keywords

Apolipoprotein B; Genetic polymorphism; Elderly; Hyperlipidemia; Diet

Funding

  1. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [445692/2014-6]
  2. Research Support Foundation of the Federal District (FAPDF) [193.000.967/2015, 193.000.651/2015]
  3. Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education (CAPES) [001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The apolipoprotein B (APOB) gene contains several polymorphic sites described as risk modifiers for cardiovascular events. The objective of this study was to verify the association of the classic APOB Xba I polymorphism (rs693) with atherosclerotic risk factors in a segment of the Brazilian elderly population considering their usual dietary intake. Clinical and biochemical characteristics as well as total caloric and fat intake data were determined from 644 elderly individuals. Polymorphism analysis was performed by conventional polymerase chain reaction followed by enzyme restriction. Statistical analyses compared measures and proportions according to different APOB genotypic combinations. Statistically significant association was found between Xba I polymorphism and serum LDL, total cholesterol, and total lipid levels, with important elevations among T homozygotes compared to the other genotypes. There was homogeneity in all other parameters analyzed (including intake pattern), with a tendency for reduced levels of circulating apolipoprotein B among TT individuals. Our results pointed out that genetic variation in APOB affected the lipemic profile of elderly individuals in a context not biased by diet, generating a pattern suggestive of secretory disorder of lipoprotein particles, with possible implication in atherosclerotic risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available