4.7 Article

Substructure of Visibility Functions from Scattered Radio Emission of Pulsars through Space VLBI

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 888, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5db6

Keywords

Interstellar scintillation; Radio pulsars; Very long baseline interferometry; Interstellar scattering

Funding

  1. Russian Academy of Science Program [KP19-270]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report on the substructure of visibility functions in the delay domain of PSRs B0329+54, B0823+26, B0834+06, B1933+16, and B0833-45 (Vela) observed with Earth-Earth and RadioAstron space-Earth two-element interferometers at frequencies of 324 and 1668 MHz. All visibility functions display unresolved spikes distributed over a range of delays. They are due to band-limited scintillation noise and related to the scattering time. The envelopes for each but the Vela pulsar are well fit by a single Lorentzian, which we interpret as being indicative of isotropic scattering on the plane of the sky due to a thin scattering screen between the pulsar and us. In contrast, the envelope for the Vela pulsar needs to be mostly fit by at least two Lorentzians, a narrow and a broad one at the same zero delay. We interpret this characteristic as indicative of anisotropic scattering due to a more complex structure of scattering screens in the supernova remnant. The possibility of describing the delay visibility functions by Lorentzians is likely a general property of pulsars and offers a new way of describing the scattering parameters of the intervening interstellar medium. Furthermore, for all of our pulsars, the unresolved spikes in visibility functions of similar projected baselines were well correlated, indicating that the telescopes are located in the same diffraction spot. The correlation vanished for visibilities from largely different baselines, when some radio telescopes are not in the same spot.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available