Journal
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages 714-722Publisher
AMER STATISTICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1080/07350015.2017.1305276
Keywords
Business growth; Counterfactual elicitation; Randomized experiment; Subjective expectations
Funding
- World Bank
- WLSME trust fund
- John Templeton Foundation
- DFiD
Ask authors/readers for more resources
A survey of participants in a large-scale business plan competition experiment, in which winners received an average of U.S. $50,000 each, is used to elicit ex-post beliefs about what the outcomes would have been in the alternative treatment status. Participants are asked the percent chance they would be operating a firm, and the number of employees and monthly sales they would have, had their treatment status been reversed. The study finds the control group to have reasonably accurate expectations of the large treatment effect they would experience on the likelihood of operating a firm, although this may reflect the treatment effect being close to an upper bound. The control group dramatically overestimates how much winning would help them grow the size of their firm. The treatment group overestimates how much winning helps their chance of their business surviving and also overestimates how much winning helps them grow their firms. In addition, these counterfactual expectations appear unable to generate accurate relative rankings of which groups of participants benefit most from treatment.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available