4.2 Article

A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Adult Burn Research

Journal

JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & RESEARCH
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages E521-E545

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000474

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Restore Burn and Wound Research charity - Restore Burn and Wound Research
  2. Children's Burns Research Centre
  3. Dan's Fund for Burns

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are vital for evaluating patient needs and therapeutic progress. This review aimed to identify the PROMs used in adult burn care and establish their quality. Computerized bibliographic searches of Psychinfo, Social Sciences Citation Index, Cinahl, Psycharticles, AMED, Medline, and HAPI were used to find English-language articles using English-language PROMs from January 2001 to September 2016. Psychometric quality assessment of the PROMs was conducted. A total of 117 studies achieved the entry criteria and reported using 77 different PROMs (71 generic and 6 burn specific). Overall, the psychometric quality of the PROMs was low; only 17 (13 generic and 4 burn-specific) had psychometric evidence appropriate to adults with burn injuries completing an English language version of the PROM. Although this review identified a number of generic and burn-specific PROMs that have some psychometric evidence with adult burn patients, research is still needed to further examine these preexisting measures and validate them in different languages. This will enable researchers and clinicians to better understand the potential impact of a burn injury on adults, and evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. (J Burn Care Res 2017; 38: e521-e545)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available