4.2 Article

On Bilevel Optimization with Inexact Follower

Journal

DECISION ANALYSIS
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 74-95

Publisher

INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/deca.2019.0392

Keywords

bilevel optimization; hierarchical optimization; robust optimization; heuristics; defender-attacker problem

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1400009, CMMI-1634835]
  2. DoD DURIP [FA2386-12-1-3032]
  3. Office of Naval Research [N00014-19-1-2330]
  4. Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Mathematical Modeling and Optimization Institute
  5. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR)
  6. Complex Engineering Systems Institute, ISCI (CONICYT) [PIA FB0816]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traditionally, in the bilevel optimization framework, a leader chooses her actions by solving an upper-level problem, assuming that a follower chooses an optimal reaction by solving a lower-level problem. However, in many settings, the lower-level problems might be nontrivial, thus requiring the use of tailored algorithms for their solution. More importantly, in practice, such problems might be inexactly solved by heuristics and approximation algorithms. Motivated by this consideration, we study a broad class of bilevel optimization problems where the follower might not optimally react to the leader's actions. In particular, we present a modeling framework in which the leader considers that the follower might use one of a number of known algorithms to solve the lower-level problem, either approximately or heuristically. Thus, the leader can hedge against the follower's use of suboptimal solutions. We provide algorithmic implementations of the framework for a class of nonlinear bilevel knapsack problem (BKP), and we illustrate the potential impact of incorporating this realistic feature through numerical experiments in the context of defender-attacker problems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available