4.6 Review

Carbapenem-Sparing Strategies for ESBL Producers: When and How

Journal

ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics9020061

Keywords

ESBLs; piperacillin-tazobactam; carbapenem-sparing treatment; cefepime; fosfomycin; urinary tract infection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria are prevalent worldwide and correlated with hospital infections, but they have been evolving as an increasing cause of community acquired infections. The spread of ESBL constitutes a major threat for public health, and infections with ESBL-producing organisms have been associated with poor outcomes. Established therapeutic options for severe infections caused by ESBL-producing organisms are considered the carbapenems. However, under the pressure of carbapenem overuse and the emergence of resistance, carbapenem-sparing strategies have been implemented. The administration of carbapenem-sparing antibiotics for the treatment of ESBL infections has yielded conflicting results. Herein, the current available knowledge regarding carbapenem-sparing strategies for ESBL producers is reviewed, and the optimal conditions for the when and how of carbapenem-sparing agents is discussed. An important point of the review focuses on piperacillin-tazobactam as the agent arousing the most debate. The most available data regarding non-carbapenem beta-lactams (i.e., ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, temocillin, cephamycins and cefepime) are also thoroughly presented as well as non beta-lactams (i.e., aminoglycosides, quinolones, tigecycline, eravacycline and fosfomycin).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available