4.7 Article

Rationally designed trimetallic Prussian blue analogues on LDH/Ni foam for high performance supercapacitors

Journal

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
Volume 49, Issue 12, Pages 3706-3714

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9dt02598g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21871156]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY18B010004]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo [2017A610065, 2018A610066]
  4. K.C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rational design of a Prussian blue analogue (PBA)@Ni-Co layered double hydroxide (NiCo-LDH) nanocomposite electrode material is vitally important for synthesizing high-performance supercapacitor electrodes. In this work, such nanocomposite electrode materials were successfully fabricated by a facile hydrothermal method. Firstly, three-dimensional (3D) regulated NiCo-LDH nanosheets with high interlayer space were grown on nickel foam under mild synthetic conditions. Then these nanosheets as a precursor were in situ converted into the target PBA@NiCo-LDH/NF nanocomposite electrode by a facile thermal ion-exchange reaction with potassium ferricyanide (K-3[Fe(CN)(6)]). A series of PBA@NiCo-LDH/NF nanocomposite electrodes were fabricated with different ratios of Ni and Co and reaction temperatures. Their structures and morphologies were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), FT-IR and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Electrochemical investigation reveals that the PBA@Ni0.4Co0.6-LDH electrode exhibits the best electrochemical performance with an area specific capacitance of 2004.26 mF cm(-2) at 1 mA cm(-2), which is much higher (about three times) than the properties of each single component. All results demonstrate that (1) high-performance composite electrodes can be effectively fabricated and (2) fabrication of such composites is highly necessary and important.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available