4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Weighty choices: selecting optimal G-CSF doses for stem cell mobilization to optimize yield

Journal

BLOOD ADVANCES
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 706-716

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000923

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Public Health Service from the National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health [5U24CA076518]
  2. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health [5U24CA076518]
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health [5U24CA076518]
  4. NHLBI [1U24HL138660]
  5. NCI [1U24HL138660]
  6. Health Resources and Services Administration [HHSH250201700006C]
  7. Office of Naval Research [N00014-17-1-2388, N00014-17-1-2850, N00014-18-1-2045]
  8. Adaptive Biotechnologies
  9. Astellas Pharma US
  10. Atara Biotherapeutics Inc.
  11. Be The Match Foundation
  12. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  13. Gamida Cell Ltd
  14. Gilead Sciences Inc.
  15. HistoGenetics Inc.
  16. Immucor
  17. Janssen Scientific Affairs LLC
  18. Karius Inc.
  19. Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.
  20. Medac GmbH
  21. Medical College of Wisconsin
  22. MesoScale Diagnostics Inc.
  23. Millennium
  24. Takeda Oncology Co.
  25. Mundipharma EDO
  26. National Marrow Donor Program
  27. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.
  28. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  29. PIRCHE AG
  30. Shire
  31. Spectrum Pharmaceuticals Inc.
  32. St Baldrick's Foundation
  33. Swedish Orphan Biovitrum Inc.
  34. University of Minnesota
  35. Amgen Inc.
  36. bluebird bio Inc.
  37. Bristol-Myers Squibb Oncology
  38. Celgene Corp.
  39. Chimerix Inc.
  40. CytoSen Therapeutics Inc.
  41. Incyte Corp.
  42. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc.
  43. Kite Pharma Inc.
  44. Mediware
  45. Merck Co. Inc.
  46. Mesoblast
  47. Miltenyi Biotec Inc.
  48. Pfizer Inc.
  49. Pharmacyclics LLC
  50. Sanofi Genzyme
  51. Seattle Genetics
  52. Takeda Oncology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are limited data on the effect of donor body mass index (BMI) on peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization response to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), especially in unrelated donors. Obesity has been associated with persistent leukocytosis, elevated circulating progenitor cells, and enhanced stem cell mobilization. Therefore, we hypothesized that adequate collection of CD34(+) cells may be achieved with lower doses (per kilogram of body weight) of G-CSF in donors with higher BMI compared with donors with lower BMI. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we evaluated the impact of donor BMI on G-CSF-mobilized PBSC yield in healthy unrelated donors. We examined 20 884 PBSC donations collected at National Marrow Donor Program centers between 2006 and 2016. We found significantly higher collection yields in obese and severely obese donors compared with normal and overweight donors. An increase in average daily G-CSF dose was associated with an increase in stem cell yield in donors with normal or overweight BMI. In contrast, an increase in average daily G-CSF dose beyond 780 mu g per day in obese and 900 mg per day in severely obese donors did not increase cell yield. Pain and toxicities were assessed at baseline, during G-CSF administration, and postcollection. Obesity was associated with higher levels of self-reported donation-related pain and toxicities in the pericollection and early postdonation recovery periods. This study suggests a maximum effective G-CSF dose for PBSC mobilization in obese and severely obese donors, beyond which higher doses of G-CSF add no increased yield.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available