4.8 Article

Rigid Ladder-Type Porous Polymer Networks for Entropically Favorable Gas Adsorption

Journal

ACS MATERIALS LETTERS
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 49-54

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b00434

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Robert A. Welch Foundation [A1898]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory [DEFE0026472]
  3. National Science Foundation Small Business Innovation Research (NSF-SBIR) program [1632486]
  4. Washington State University
  5. Center for Gas Separations, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001015]
  6. Directorate For Engineering [1632486] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh [1632486] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To improve methane storage capacity of porous organic materials, this work demonstrates that a rigid ladder-type backbone is more entropically favorable for gas adsorption and leads to a high gas uptake per unit surface area. A porous ladder polymer network was designed and synthesized as the model material via cross-coupling polymerization and subsequent ring-closing olefin metathesis, followed by characterization by solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. This material exhibited a remarkable methane uptake per unit surface area, which outperformed those of most reported porous organic materials. Variable-temperature thermodynamic adsorption measurements corroborated the significantly less negative entropy penalty during high-pressure gas adsorption, compared to its non-ladder-type counterpart. This method provides an orthogonal strategy for multiplying volumetric methane uptake capacity of porous materials. The entropic approach also offers the opportunity to increase deliverable gas upon pressure change while mitigating the performance decline in high-temperature applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available