4.5 Article

Possibility of 14C cluster as a building block of medium-mass nuclei

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
Volume 101, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.034304

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. KAKENHI of Japan [17K05440]
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics [DE-SC0013037]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K05440] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The possibility of the C-14 cluster being a basic building block of medium-mass nuclei is discussed. Although alpha cluster structures have been widely discussed in the light N approximate to Z mass region, the neutron-to-proton ratio deviates from unity in the nuclei near beta-stability line and in neutron-rich nuclei. Thus, more neutron-rich objects with N > Z could become the building blocks of cluster structures in such nuclei. The C-14 nucleus is strongly bound and can be regarded as such a candidate. In addition, the path to the lowest shell-model configuration at short relative distances is closed for the C-14 + C-14 structure, contrary to the case of the C-12 + C-12 structure; this allows an appreciable separation distance between the C-14 clusters. The recent development of the antisymmetrized quasicluster model (AQCM) allows us to utilize a j j-coupling shell-model wave function for each cluster in a simplified way. The AQCM results for the C-14 + C-14 structure in Mg-28 are compared with the ones of cranked relativistic mean field (CRMF) calculations. Although theoretical frameworks of these two models are quite different, they give similar results for the nucleonic densities and rotational properties of the structure under investigation. The existence of a linear chain three-C-14 cluster structure in Ar-42 has also been predicted in AQCM. These results confirm the role of the C-14 cluster as a possible building block of cluster structures in medium-mass nuclei.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available