4.6 Article

The effect of solvents on the thermal degradation products of two Amadori derivatives

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 10, Issue 16, Pages 9309-9317

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ra09854b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Key Science and Technology Program of Science and the Technology Department of Henan Province [132102210042]
  2. Henan Agricultural University [30500569]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To enrich the flavor additives of the Maillard reaction, two Amadori analogs, N-(1-deoxy-d-fructosyl-1-yl)-l-phenylalanine ester (Derivative 1) and di-O-isopropylidene-2,3:4,5-beta-d-fructopyranosyl phenylalanine ester (Derivative 2), were chemically synthesized starting from d-fructose. The samples were reacted at 120 and 180 degrees C for 2 h, and the effects of solvents (water and ethanol) on their degradation products were studied. The analyses of thermogravimetry (TG), derivative thermogravimetry (DTG), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) were used to investigate the thermal behavior and degradation products of the samples. TG-DTG curves show that the T-p values of the samples corresponding to the largest mass-loss rates are 132 and 275 degrees C, respectively. The degradation products of Derivative 1 are mainly phenyl acetaldehyde and phenylalanine ethyl ester in water and ethyl benzoate and benzaldehyde diethyl acetal in ethanol. For Derivative 2, the major degradation products both in water and ethanol are phenylalanine ethyl ester and diacetonefructose, but the products have different relative contents affected by solvent media. The products of the pyrolysis of the samples at 350 degrees C were analyzed and compared with the degradation compounds obtained in solvent. These results show that organic solvents can greatly influence the degradation pathway and products. Finally, possible mechanisms of the degradation processes are proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available