4.7 Article

Speed of gravity

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 101, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063518

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Simons Emmy Noether program
  2. STFC [ST/P000762/1]
  3. Royal Society
  4. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research Council [724659 MassiveCosmo ERC-2016-COG]
  5. Simons Foundation under the Simons Foundation's Origins of the Universe initiative, Cosmology Beyond Einstein's Theory [555326]
  6. Mainz Institute for Theoretical Physics (MITP) off the DFG Cluster of Excellence PRISMA+ [39083149]
  7. STFC [ST/P000762/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Within the standard effective field theory of general relativity, we show that the speed of gravitational waves deviates, ever so slightly, from luminality on cosmological and other spontaneously Lorentz-breaking backgrounds. This effect results from loop contributions from massive fields of any spin, including Standard Model fields, or from tree level effects from massive higher spins s >= 2. We show that for the choice of interaction signs implied by S-matrix and spectral density positivity bounds suggested by analyticity and causality, the speed of gravitational waves is in general superluminal at low energies on null energy condition preserving backgrounds, meaning gravitational waves travel faster than allowed by the metric to which photons and Standard Model fields are minimally coupled. We show that departure of the speed from unity increases in the IR and argue that the speed inevitably returns to luminal at high energies as required by Lorentz invariance. Performing a special tuning of the effective field theory so that renormalization sensitive curvature-squared terms arc set to zero, we find that finite loop corrections from Standard Model fields still lead to an epoch dependent modification of the speed of gravitational waves which is determined by the precise field content of the lightest particles with masses larger than the Hubble parameter today. Depending on interpretation, such considerations could potentially have far-reaching implications on light scalar models, such as axionic or fuzzy cold dark matter.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available