4.5 Article

Chiral behavior in rat tail tendon fascicles

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 64, Issue -, Pages 206-211

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.09.034

Keywords

Tendon; Fascicle; Mechanics; Chirality; Cosserat elasticity

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1432937]
  2. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1432937] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ex vivo tendon mechanical behavior has been well described under rotationally constrained uniaxial tensile testing. During standard loading of rat tail tendon (RTT) fascicles, apparent axial twist has been observed. To quantify this behavior, we designed a custom testing setup, utilizing magnetic suspension, to allow unconstrained axial rotation during tensile loading. We characterized the rotational behavior of single and paired WIT fascicles under cyclic loading. We also measured stress relaxation across loading cycles as well as rotational relaxation. Single fascicle nonlinear stretch-twist coupling is well described by the asymptotic function Delta theta = A(1 - e(-B epsilon)) in which fascicles rotated a mean +/- 51.1 degrees within about 1% applied axial strain. On average, paired fascicles rotated just over 10 degrees less. Specimen cross-sectional diameter had a noticeable effect on the measured mechanical properties, particularly effective elastic modulus. Such stretch-twist coupling and size dependence cannot be understood via classical elasticity but is predicted by Cosserat (micropolar) elasticity. The current study demonstrates RTT fascicles are chiral based on observed axial load-induced twist. Additionally, our findings support existing research that suggests a helical fascicle structure. Potential consequences of helical substructures, mechanical and biological, merit further investigation. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available