4.5 Article

Oscillatory fluid flow induces the osteogenic lineage commitment of mesenchymal stem cells: The, effect of shear stress magnitude, frequency, and duration

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
Volume 55, Issue -, Pages 99-106

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.02.002

Keywords

Mesenchymal stem cell; Bone; Mechanobiology; Fluid flow; Bioreactor

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) Starting Grant [336882]
  2. Science Foundation Ireland ERC Support Grant [SFI 13/ERC/L2864]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [336882] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A potent regulator of bone anabolism is physical loading. However, it is currently unclear whether physical stimuli such as fluid shear within the marrow cavity is sufficient to directly drive the osteogenic lineage commitment of resident mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). Therefore, the objective of the study is to employ a systematic analysis of oscillatory fluid flow (OFF) parameters predicted to occur in vivo on early MSC osteogenic responses and late stage lineage commitment. MSCs were exposed to OFF of 1 Pa, 2 Pa and 5 Pa magnitudes at frequencies of 0.5 Hz, 1 Hz and 2 Hz for 1 h, 2 h and 4 h of stimulation. Our findings demonstrate that OFF elicits a positive osteogenic response in MSCs in a shear stress magnitude, frequency, and duration dependent manner that is gene specific. Based on the mRNA expression of osteogenic markers Cox2, Runx2 and Opn after short-term fluid flow stimulation, we identified that a regime of 2 Pa shear magnitude and 2 Hz frequency induces the most robust and reliable upregulation in osteogenic gene expression. Furthermore, long-term mechanical stimulation utilising this regime, elicits a significant increase in collagen and mineral deposition when compared to static control demonstrating that mechanical stimuli predicted within the marrow is sufficient to directly drive osteogenesis. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available