4.5 Article

Positive Parenting, Effortful Control, and Developmental Outcomes Across Early Childhood

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages 444-457

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/dev0000874

Keywords

effortful control; positive parenting; externalizing behavior; school performance; random intercept cross-lagged panel models

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging [AG043599]
  2. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [HD064687]
  3. National Institute of Mental Health [MH00567, MH19734, MH43270, MH59355, MH62989, MH48165, MH051361]
  4. National Institute on Drug Abuse [DA05347]
  5. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [HD027724, HD051746, HD047573]
  6. Bureau of Maternal and Child Health [MCJ109572]
  7. MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Successful Adolescent Development Among Youth in High-Risk Settings

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current study evaluated bidirectional associations between mother and father positive parenting and child effortful control. Data were drawn from 220 families when children were 3, 4, 5, and 6 years old. Parenting and effortful control were assessed when the child was 3, 4, and 5 years old. These variables were used to statistically predict child externalizing and school performance assessed when the child was 6 years old. The study used random intercept cross-lagged panel models to evaluate within-person and between-person associations between parenting and effortful control. Results suggest that prior positive parenting was associated with later effortful control, whereas effortful control was not associated with subsequent parenting from ages 3 to 5. Stable between-child differences in effortful control from ages 3 to 5 were associated with school performance at age 6. These stable between-child differences in effortful control were correlated with externalizing at age 3.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available