4.7 Article

Synoptic Spatio-Temporal Variability of the Photosynthetic Productivity of Microphytobenthos and Phytoplankton in a Tidal Estuary

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00170

Keywords

chlorophyll a fluorescence; estuaries; diatoms; microphytobenthos; photoacclimation; photosynthesis; phytoplankton; productivity

Funding

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), through Project BioChangeR [PTDC/AAC-AMB/121191/2010]
  2. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), through project Evo-Sym [POCI01-0145-FEDER-028751]
  3. FEDER, through COMPETE2020 -Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalizacao (POCI)
  4. national funds (OE), through FCT/MCTES
  5. national funds (OE), through FCT
  6. Sapere-Aude Advanced grant from the Danish Council for Independent Research/Natural Sciences
  7. Carlsberg Foundation
  8. CESAM [UID/AMB/50017 -POCI-01-0145FEDER-007638, UIDP/50017/2020+UIDB/50017/2020]
  9. FEDER, within the PT2020 Partnership Agreement
  10. Compete 2020
  11. FCT/MEC through national funds (PIDDAC)
  12. [BI/UI88/6484/2013]
  13. [SFRH/BD/86788/2012]
  14. [SFRH/BD/103973/2014]
  15. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/103973/2014] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tidal estuaries are regarded as highly important ecosystems, mostly due to their high primary productivity and associated role as carbon sinks. In these ecosystems, primary productivity is mainly due to the photosynthetic carbon fixation by phytoplankton and microphytobenthos. The productivity of the two communities has been mostly studied separately, and directly comparable estimates of their carbon fixation rates in the same estuary are relatively scarce. The present study aimed to characterize the spatiotemporal variability of the productivity of phytoplankton and microphytobenthos in a tidal estuary, the Ria de Aveiro (Portugal). The productivity of the two communities was determined using a common methodological approach, based on measurements of in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence, allowing the estimation of the annual ecosystemlevel budget for carbon fixation by the two groups. Productivity rates were determined based on synoptic in situ measurements of absolute rates of electron transport rate of photosystem II, using Pulse Amplitude Modulation fluorometry. Chlorophyll fluorescence indices were accompanied by measurements of salinity, temperature, water turbidity, solar irradiance, and planktonic and benthic microalgal biomass. Measurements were carried out hourly, along four spring-neap tidal cycles distributed along 1 year, on three sites of the estuary. The most pronounced trends in the spatio-temporal variability of the photophysiology and productivity of the two communities were the following: (i) maximum biomass and productivity were reached later for microphytobenthos (summerautumn) than for phytoplankton (spring-summer); (ii) the absorption cross-section of PSII was generally higher for phytoplankton; (iii) the two groups showed a similar photoacclimation state, but microphytobenthos appeared as high light-acclimated when compared to phytoplankton. Biomass-specific productivity was on average higher for phytoplankton than for microphytobenthos, averaging 68.0 and 19.1 mg C mg Chl a(-1) d(-1), respectively. However, areal depth-integrated production rates were generally higher for the microphytobenthos than for the phytoplankton, averaging 264.5 and 140.0 mg C m(-2) d(-1), respectively. On an annual basis, phytoplankton productivity averaged 49.9 g C m(-2) yr(-1) while the productivity of microphytobenthos averaged 105.2 g C m(-2) yr(-1). When upscaling to the whole estuary, annual primary production rates of phytoplankton and microphytobenthos reached 4894.3 and 7534.0 t C yr(-1), respectively, representing 39.4 and 60.6% of the combined total of 12428.3 t C yr(-1) determined for the two communities in the Ria de Aveiro.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available