4.7 Article

Experimental study on secondary flow in turbulent boundary layer over spanwise heterogeneous microgrooves

Journal

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5142727

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Manchester

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Convergent-divergent riblets (C-D riblets) are a type of grooved surface pattern with directionality and spanwise heterogeneity. In the cross-stream plane, we apply stereoscopic particle image velocimetry to study the characteristics of the secondary flow over C-D riblets. Three different heights of h(+) = 8, 14, and 20 are applied in the turbulent boundary layers at Re-theta = 723 to reveal the effect of riblet height on the flow field. In the cross-stream plane, increasing the riblet height intensifies the heterogeneity of turbulent properties, i.e., a wider downwelling region, a stronger spanwise flow, a narrower upwelling region, and a stronger deceleration effect. Compared with the smooth-wall case, the magnitude of spanwise velocity fluctuations is larger over the converging region. The dispersive momentum transfer is primarily contributed by the secondary-flow-induced stress compared with the roughness-induced stress, and it becomes more intense as the riblet height increases. Compared with the smooth-wall case, the near-wall streamwise turbulent events are slightly wider over the diverging region and much narrower over the converging region. Overall, the higher C-D riblets generate a more intense secondary flow, and the mechanism of an increasing riblet height is attributed to the greater capability of deeper yawed microgrooves. In light of the results from our study, we propose a different way of categorizing the surface patterns with spanwise heterogeneity from the perspectives of surface geometry, roll mode, and secondary flow generation mechanisms. Published under license by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available