4.6 Article

Small-scale demixing in confluent biological tissues

Journal

SOFT MATTER
Volume 16, Issue 13, Pages 3325-3337

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9sm01084j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [POLS-1607416, DMR-1352184]
  2. Simons Foundation [454947, 342345]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy - CECAD [EXC 2030 - 390661388, 73111208 - SFB 829, NI1234/6-2 - SPP1782]
  4. Syracuse University Soft and Living Matter Program
  5. BioInspired Syracuse

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surface tension governed by differential adhesion can drive fluid particle mixtures to sort into separate regions, i.e., demix. Does the same phenomenon occur in confluent biological tissues? We begin to answer this question for epithelial monolayers with a combination of theory via a vertex model and experiments on keratinocyte monolayers. Vertex models are distinct from particle models in that the interactions between the cells are shape-based, as opposed to distance-dependent. We investigate whether a disparity in cell shape or size alone is sufficient to drive demixing in bidisperse vertex model fluid mixtures. Surprisingly, we observe that both types of bidisperse systems robustly mix on large lengthscales. On the other hand, shape disparity generates slight demixing over a few cell diameters, a phenomenon we term micro-demixing. This result can be understood by examining the differential energy barriers for neighbor exchanges (T1 transitions). Experiments with mixtures of wild-type and E-cadherin-deficient keratinocytes on a substrate are consistent with the predicted phenomenon of micro-demixing, which biology may exploit to create subtle patterning. The robustness of mixing at large scales, however, suggests that despite some differences in cell shape and size, progenitor cells can readily mix throughout a developing tissue until acquiring means of recognizing cells of different types.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available