4.3 Article

Implementing Quality Control of High-Frequency Radar Estimates and Application to Gulf Stream Surface Currents

Journal

JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages 1207-1224

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0203.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research - initial acquisition and operation of the radars (SEACOOS Project) [N00014-02-1-0972]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quality control procedures based on nonvelocity parameters for use with a short-range radar system are applied with slight modification to long-range radar data collected offshore of North Carolina. The radar footprint covers shelf and slope environments and includes a segment of the Gulf Stream (GS). Standard processed and quality controlled (QCD) radar data are compared with 4 months of acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) time series collected at three different sites within the radar footprint. Two of the ADCP records are from the shelf and the third is on the upper slope and is frequently within the GS. Linear regression and Bland-Altman diagrams are used to quantify the comparison. QCD data at all sites have reduced scatter and improved correlation with ADCP observations relative to standard processed data. Uncertainty is reduced by approximately 20%, and linear regression slopes and correlation coefficients increase by about 0.1. At the upper slope site, the QCD data also produced a significant increase in the mean speed. Additionally, a significant increase, averaging roughly 20%, in mean speed in the GS is apparent when comparing standard processed data and QCD data, concentrated at large range and at the azimuthal extremes of radial site coverage. Shifts in the distributions of the standard processed and QCDvelocity estimates are consistent with the removal of zero-mean noise from the observations, which has minimal impact where the radial site range is <70 km and a large impact at greater range in the GS where mean currents exceed 1ms(-1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available