3.8 Article

Similar transplant outcomes between haploidentical and unrelated donors after reduced-intensity conditioning with busulfan, fludarabine, and anti-thymocyte globulin in patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome

Journal

BLOOD RESEARCH
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages 27-34

Publisher

KOREAN SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.5045/br.2020.55.1.27

Keywords

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation; HLA-matched unrelated donor; Reduced-intensity conditioning; Anti-thymocyte globulin

Categories

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean Government (MSIP) [NRF-2016R1A5A1011974]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Although T-cell-replete hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from haploidentical donors (HIDs) using anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) has shown promising outcomes, previous studies often adopted heterogenous graft sources and conditioning. Methods We retrospectively compared HCT outcomes from 62 HIDs, 36 partially-matched unrelated donors (PUDs), and 55 matched unrelated donors (MUDs) in patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome using the same graft source of peripheral blood and a reduced intensity conditioning of busulfan, fludarabine, and ATG. Results The estimates of 3-yr disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were not significantly different among the MUD, HID, and PUD groups, at 46%, 41%, and 36% for the DFS rate (P = 0.844), and 55%, 45%, and 45% for the OS rate (P = 0.802), respectively. Cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality at 3 yr was similar among different donor types. Subsequent multivariable analyses showed that the sex of the patient (male) and a high/very high disease risk index were independently associated with poorer DFS and OS, while the donor type was not. Conclusion T-cell replete HCT from HIDs using an ATG-containing reduced intensity conditioning regimen may be a reasonable option in the absence of matched related donors in patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available