3.8 Article

Investigating the Link between Lynch Syndrome and Breast Cancer

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 106-109

Publisher

GALENOS PUBL HOUSE
DOI: 10.5152/ejbh.2020.5198

Keywords

Breast neoplasms; cancer screening; colorectal cancer hereditary nonpolyposis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Lynch syndrome is an inherited genetic disorder associated with a predisposition to early-onset colorectal and endornet dal cancers, but breast cancer risk in these patients is debated. The aim of this study is to evaluate breast cancer rates in a cohort of Lynch syndrome patients, as well as to identify women who may he eligible for additional breast cancer specific generic testing or enhanced breast surveillance (contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening). Materials and Methods: Using a hereditary colorectal cancer registry at a single academic institution for identification of patients with Lynch syndrome, a retrospective chart review was performed of 188 women with DNA mismatch repair (MMR) mutations. The Tyrer-Cuzick model was used to estimate breast cancer risk in patients without breast cancer. Results: The prevalence of breast cancer differed based on mutation type (p=0.0043), as 27% of women with a PMS2 mutation were diagnosed with breast cancer, compared to 396, 4%, and 9% in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 patients. The average age at diagnosis for women with a PMS2 mutation was 46.7 years. Additionally, 7.5% of unaffected women had an estimated lifetime risk of breast cancer greater than 20%. 46/188 (24.4%) of patients were eligible for breast specific genetic testing. Conclusion: Our analysis suggests that Lynch syndrome patients with PMS2 mutations may be at higher risk of developing breast cancer. Additionally, the personal and family history of cancer suggests crossover in eligibility for breast specific generic resting in a significant number of patients (16.5-24.4%). Also, many women are eligible for enhanced breast surveillance (7.5%) which would otherwise nor be offered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available