4.5 Article

Otoliths as indicators for fish behaviour and procurement strategies of hunter-gatherers in North Patagonia

Journal

HELIYON
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03438

Keywords

North patagonia; Otolith chemistry; Archaeological otoliths; Habitat use; Hunter-gatherers; Fish capture techniques; Late holocene; Biogeochemistry; Trace element geochemistry; Aquatic biology; Zoology Archeology

Funding

  1. Government of the Principality of Asturias [FC-15-GRUPIN14-040]
  2. CONICET [PIP112-20120100543CO]
  3. Universidad de Buenos Aires
  4. ANPCYT [PICT 2010-132]
  5. CONICET (PIP-CONICET) [6147/05]
  6. ANPCYT (PICT) [264]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the potential use of archaeological otoliths of Genidens barbus (Cuvier and Valenciennes) as a tool to study fish behavior and hunter-gatherers procurement strategies on the North Patagonian coast. The studied samples come from the San Antonio archaeological locality dated at ca. 1000-800 C-14 yr BP (Late Holocene). To assess whether exposure to fire significantly affects the otolith Sr:Ca and Ba:Ca ratios, burned and unburned modern lapilli otoliths have been analyzed by Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry and no statistically significant differences were found between the results of both treatments. Core-to-edge chemical time series were carried out on ancient otoliths (ca. 1000 C-14 yr BP) in order to study the fish life history. Three amphidromous patterns were found for ancient samples. The capture environments and seasons inferred by the otolith edge chemistry and marginal increase, respectively, suggest a location in high salinity water (estuary and sea) in summer. Finally, to estimate the size of archaeological fish, a linear regression between total length and otolith length was constructed using 70 modern catfish otoliths. The size variability (358-610 mm) might indicate the use of non-selective capture techniques, probably nets, by hunter-gatherer groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available