4.5 Article

The potential of industrial waste: using foundry sand with fly ash and electric arc furnace slag for geopolymer brick production

Journal

HELIYON
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03697

Keywords

Civil engineering; Materials science; Environmental science; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental management; Geopolymer brick; Waste foundry sand; Fly ash; Electric arc furnace slag; Leaching of heavy metals; Life cycle assessment; Economic feasibility

Funding

  1. Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund [CU-GI_62_20_23_03]
  2. Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund, Chulalongkorn University (STAR) [STF 62004230]
  3. Research Program: Municipal Solid Waste and Hazardous Waste Management, Center of Excellence on Hazardous Substance Management [HSM-PJCT-17-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to investigate the best ratio of waste foundry sand (WFS), fly ash (FA), and electric arc furnace slag (EAF slag) for the production of geopolymer bricks. In this research study, WFS, FA, and EAF slag were mixed at the ratio of 70:30:0, 60:30:10, 50:30:20, and 40:30:30 with 8M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and 98% purity sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) with a ratio of Na2SiO3/8M NaOH - 2.5. The mixtures were compacted in 5 cm x 5 cm x 5 cm molds and cured at an ambient temperature for 28 days. Then, their compressive strength was analyzed. The results showed that the geopolymer bricks with the highest compressive strength were those mixed at the 40:30:30 ratio, with a compressive strength of 25.76 MPa. The strongest bricks were also analyzed using the leaching test to ensure the production involved non-hazardous materials. To compare the environmental impacts of geopolymer bricks and concrete bricks, their effects on climate change, ozone depletion, terrestrial acidification, human toxicity, terrestrial ecotoxicity, and fossil fuel depletion were examined from cradle to grave using SimaPro 8.0.5.13 software. The results of the life cycle assessment (LCA) from cradle to grave showed that the environmental impact of geopolymer brick production was lower in every aspect than that of concrete production. Therefore, geopolymer brick production can reduce environmental impact and can be a value-added use for industrial waste.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available