4.7 Article

DNA copy number motifs are strong and independent predictors of survival in breast cancer

Journal

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-020-0884-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Li Ka Shing Foundation
  2. National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  3. Francis Crick Institute from Cancer Research UK [FC001202]
  4. UK Medical Research Council [FC001202]
  5. Wellcome Trust [FC001202]
  6. MRC [MC_UU_00002/16] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Somatic copy number alterations are a frequent sign of genome instability in cancer. A precise characterization of the genome architecture would reveal underlying instability mechanisms and provide an instrument for outcome prediction and treatment guidance. Here we show that the local spatial behavior of copy number profiles conveys important information about this architecture. Six filters were defined to characterize regional traits in copy number profiles, and the resulting Copy Aberration Regional Mapping Analysis (CARMA) algorithm was applied to tumors in four breast cancer cohorts (n=2919). The derived motifs represent a layer of information that complements established molecular classifications of breast cancer. A score reflecting presence or absence of motifs provided a highly significant independent prognostic predictor. Results were consistent between cohorts. The nonsite-specific occurrence of the detected patterns suggests that CARMA captures underlying replication and repair defects and could have a future potential in treatment stratification. Pladsen et al. develop Copy Aberration Regional Mapping Analysis (CARMA), an algorithm that derives motifs for copy number profiles in breast cancers by integrating several features, to predict breast cancer prognosis and stratifications. Their algorithm can detect replication and repair defects and can be used in personalized medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available