4.5 Article

Prosthetic model, but not stiffness or height, affects the metabolic cost of running for athletes with unilateral transtibial amputations

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 123, Issue 1, Pages 38-48

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00896.2016

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. BADER Consortium
  2. Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs cooperative agreement [W81XWH-11-2-0222]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Running-specific prostheses enable athletes with lower limb amputations to run by emulating the spring-like function of biological legs. Current prosthetic stiffness and height recommendations aim to mitigate kinematic asymmetries for athletes with unilateral transtibial amputations. However, it is unclear how different prosthetic configurations influence the biomechanics and metabolic cost of running. Consequently, we investigated how prosthetic model, stiffness, and height affect the biomechanics and metabolic cost of running. Ten athletes with unilateral transtibial amputations each performed 15 running trials at 2.5 or 3.0 m/s while we measured ground reaction forces and metabolic rates. Athletes ran using three different prosthetic models with five different stiffness category and height combinations per model. Use of an Ottobock 1E90 Sprinter prosthesis reduced metabolic cost by 4.3 and 3.4% compared with use of Freedom Innovations Catapult fixed effect (beta) = -0.177; P < 0.001] and Ossur Flex-Run (beta = -0.139; P = 0.002) prostheses, respectively. Neither prosthetic stiffness (P >= 0.180) nor height (P = 0.062) affected the metabolic cost of running. The metabolic cost of running was related to lower peak (beta = 0.649; P = 0.001) and stance average (beta = 0.772; P = 0.018) vertical ground reaction forces, prolonged ground contact times (beta = -4.349; P = 0.012), and decreased leg stiffness (beta = 0.071; P < 0.001) averaged from both legs. Metabolic cost was reduced with more symmetric peak vertical ground reaction forces (beta = 0.007; P = 0.003) but was unrelated to stride kinematic symmetry (P >= 0.636). Therefore, prosthetic recommendations based on symmetric stride kinematics do not necessarily minimize the metabolic cost of running. Instead, an optimal prosthetic model, which improves overall biomechanics, minimizes the metabolic cost of running for athletes with unilateral transtibial amputations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available