4.6 Article

First-principles characterization of native-defect-related optical transitions in ZnO

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 122, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.4992128

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Army Research Office [W911NF-16-1-0538]
  2. National Science Foundation MRSEC program [DMR-1121053]
  3. NSF [ACI-1053575]
  4. Office of Naval Research through the Naval Research Laboratory's Basic Research Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the electrical and optical properties of oxygen vacancies (V-O), zinc vacancies (V-Zn), hydrogenated V-Zn, and isolated dangling bonds in ZnO using hybrid functional calculations. While the formation energy of V-O is high in n-type ZnO, indicating that this center is unlikely to form, our results for optical absorption signals associated with V-O are consistent with those observed in irradiated samples, and give rise to emission with a peak at less than 1 eV. Under realistic growth conditions, we find that V-Zn is the lowest-energy native defect in n-type ZnO, acting as an acceptor that is likely to compensate donor doping. Turning to optical transitions, we first examine N-O as a case study, since N-related transitions have been identified in experiments on ZnO. We also examine how hydrogen, often unintentionally present in ZnO, forms stable complexes with V-Zn and modifies its optical properties. Compared with isolated V-Zn, V-Zn-H complexes have charge-state transition levels lower in the band gap as well as have lower formation energies. These complexes also lead to characteristic vibrational frequencies which compare favorably with experiment. Oxygen dangling bonds show behavior mostly consistent with V-Zn, while zinc dangling bonds give rise to transition levels near the ZnO conduction-band minimum and emission peaking near 2.4 eV. We discuss our results in view of the available experimental literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available