4.3 Article

Gender differences and business model experimentation in European SMEs

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING
Volume 35, Issue 7, Pages 1205-1219

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JBIM-05-2019-0194

Keywords

Gender; Innovation; Business development; Small to medium-sized enterprises; Business model experimentation; Business model innovation; Entrepreneurship; Female entrepreneurs; Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)

Categories

Funding

  1. European Community [645791]
  2. data to intelligence (D2I) Programme
  3. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [645791] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose By drawing on various theoretical approaches and a gender perspective, this paper aims to examine business model (BM) experimentation as a step towards BM experimentation capabilities as an outcome and, as such, a key antecedent to firm performance. Design/methodology/approach In this paper, using a unique data set of 444 European small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), the authors draw on various theoretical perspectives to devise a structural equation model that examines BM experimentation as a step towards business model innovation (BMI) as an outcome and, as such, a key antecedent to firm performance. Potential differences are examined between female-owned and non-female-owned businesses with regard to hypothesized relations. Findings Multi-group analysis results reveal that drivers of BM experimentation and the paths linking BM experimentation to overall firm performance are different for female owners in comparison to male owners. Originality/value Despite the increasing number of papers focussing on the relationship between BM and firm performance, the focus on female entrepreneurship, gender differences and BMI, more specifically the process of BMI as BM experimentation, is relatively rare.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available