4.8 Review

Recent progress, challenges, and prospects of fully integrated mobile and wearable point-of-care testing systems for self-testing

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages 1812-1866

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9cs00319c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Nano Materials Technology Development Program [NRF-2016M3A7B4910554]
  2. Basic Science Research Program [2019R1A6A1A03033215, 2016R1D1A1B03934709]
  3. Korean Research Fellowship Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Science ICT [2015H1D3A1062350, 2019H1D3A1A02071180]
  4. Ministry of Education
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015H1D3A1062350, 2019H1D3A1A02071180] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rapid growth of research in the areas of chemical and biochemical sensors, lab-on-a-chip, mobile technology, and wearable electronics offers an unprecedented opportunity in the development of mobile and wearable point-of-care testing (POCT) systems for self-testing. Successful implementation of such POCT technologies leads to minimal user intervention during operation to reduce user errors; user-friendly, easy-to-use and simple detection platforms; high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity; immediate clinical assessment; and low manufacturing and consumables costs. In this review, we discuss recent developments in the field of highly integrated mobile and wearable POCT systems. In particular, aspects of sample handling platforms, recognition elements and sensing methods, and new materials for signal transducers and powering devices for integration into mobile or wearable POCT systems will be highlighted. We also summarize current challenges and future prospects for providing personal healthcare with sample-in result-out mobile and wearable POCT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available