4.6 Article

Counting cations involved in cationic clusters of hydroxy-functionalized ionic liquids by means of infrared and solid-state NMR spectroscopy

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 22, Issue 13, Pages 6861-6867

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp00303d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [LU 506/14-1, LU 506/14-2]
  2. University of Rostock
  3. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation [AAAA-A17-117041710084-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In hydroxy-functionalized ionic liquids, two types of hydrogen bonding coexist: the conventional H-bonds between cation and anion (c-a) and those between cation and cation (c-c), although the interaction between like-charged ions is supposed to be much weaker due to the repulsive Coulomb forces. Counting the cations involved in either (c-a) or (c-c) clusters is a challenge. For that purpose, we recently performed neutron diffraction (ND) measurements and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations at and above room temperature accompanied by NMR solid-state experiments in the glassy state of the ILs. In principle, these methods are suitable for determining the populations of (c-a) and (c-c) cluster species. For different reasons we could only address single temperatures and/or small temperature intervals above 300 K. The by far largest temperature range with reasonable efforts is accessible by simple infrared (IR) spectroscopy. However, counting (c-a) or (c-c) hydrogen bonds is a difficult task due to the different transition dipole moments resulting in varying intensities and broad vibrational bands. Here we present a method for deriving the number of cations involved in (c-a) ion pairs from IR spectra in the OH stretch region. This procedure provides access to the equilibria of (c-a) and (c-c) hydrogen bonds as a function of temperature allowing derivation of the transition enthalpy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available