4.5 Article

Benchmark calculations of pure neutron matter with realistic nucleon-nucleon interactions

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.045801

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics, under FRIB Theory Alliance [DE-SC0013617]
  3. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics, under NUCLEI SciDAC program
  4. Office of Science of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report benchmark calculations of the energy per particle of pure neutron matter as a function of the baryon density using three independent many-body methods: Brueckner-Bethe-Goldstone, Fermi hypernetted chain/single-operator chain, and auxiliary-field diffusion Monte Carlo. Significant technical improvements are implemented in the latter two methods. The calculations are made for two distinct families of realistic coordinate-space nucleon-nucleon potentials fit to scattering data, including the standard Argonne upsilon(18) interaction and two of its simplified versions, and four of the new Norfolk Delta-full chiral effective field theory potentials. Primarily because of the advancements in the auxiliary-field diffusion Monte Carlo, we observe good agreement among the three many-body techniques up to nuclear saturation density-the maximum difference in the energy per particle is within 1.5 MeV for all the potentials we consider. At higher densities, the divergences become more important, and are mainly driven by the Fermi hypernetted chain/single-operator calculations. We also study the connection between nucleon-nucleon scattering data and the energy per particle of pure neutron matter. Our results suggest that fitting to higher-energy nucleon-nucleon scattering helps reduce the spread of energies among the models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available