4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Effects of using cyanobacteria and fertilizer on growth and yield of rice, Pathum Thani I: a pot experiment

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 79-85

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-017-1138-y

Keywords

Biofertilizer; Cyanobacteria; Growth; Rice; Yield

Funding

  1. Thammasat University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of cyanobacteria and chemical fertilizer on growths and yields of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cv. Pathum Thani 1 were studied in pot trials. Nine treatments were set up without cyanobacteria and fertilizer (control), inoculated with cyanobacteria Nostoc carneum TUBT04 (T1), inoculated with Nostoc commune TUBT05 (T2), and inoculated with combination of N. carneum TUBT04 and N. commune TUBT05 (T3), full dose of recommended use of fertilizer (T4), half dose of recommended use of the fertilizer (T5), half dose of fertilizer combined with N. carneum TUBT04 (T6), half dose of fertilizer combined with N. commune TUBT05 (T7), and half dose of fertilizer combined with N. carneum TUBT04 plus N. commune TUBT05 (T8). Each treatment divides into five replications. Growth parameters including length and fresh and dry weights of shoot and root were measured in the seedlings. The number of spikes per plant and the amount and weight of rice grains per spike were measured after harvesting. The supplement with cyanobacteria promoted rice seedling growth and yield compared to the control treatment. Inoculation with cyanobacteria showed significant increase in root length (p = 0.41). In addition, the combined biofertilizer with a half of the recommended dose of chemical fertilizer significantly enhanced rice production including total number and weight of grain per spike and a total weight of 100 grains (p < 0.001). Therefore, using a half dose of chemical fertilizer with cyanobacteria is suggested to decrease rice production cost of farmers without any effects on rice quantity and quality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available