4.8 Article

Meta-analysis reveals declines in terrestrial but increases in freshwater insect abundances

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 368, Issue 6489, Pages 417-+

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aax9931

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig - German Research Foundation [FZT 118]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [19-05-00245]
  3. NSF [NSF06-20443, 8811906, 9411976, 0080529, 0217774, DEB-0423704, DEB-1633026, DEB-1637685, DEB-1256696, DEB-0832652, DEB-0936498, DEB-1832016, DEB-0620652 DEB-1234162, OCE-9982133, OCE-0620959, OCE-1237140, OCE-1832178]
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [8811906, 0217774] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [0080529] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences [9411976] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent case studies showing substantial declines of insect abundances have raised alarm, but how widespread such patterns are remains unclear. We compiled data from 166 long-term surveys of insect assemblages across 1676 sites to investigate trends in insect abundances over time. Overall, we found considerable variation in trends even among adjacent sites but an average decline of terrestrial insect abundance by similar to 9% per decade and an increase of freshwater insect abundance by similar to 11% per decade. Both patterns were largely driven by strong trends in North America and some European regions. We found some associations with potential drivers (e.g., land-use drivers), and trends in protected areas tended to be weaker. Our findings provide a more nuanced view of spatiotemporal patterns of insect abundance trends than previously suggested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available