4.5 Article

Estimates of lightning NOx production based on high-resolution OMI NO2 retrievals over the continental US

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 1709-1734

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/amt-13-1709-2020

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91644224, 41705118]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lightning serves as the dominant source of nitrogen oxides (NOx=NO + NO2) in the upper troposphere (UT), with a strong impact on ozone chemistry and the hydroxyl radical production. However, the production efficiency (PE) of lightning nitrogen oxides (LNOx) is still quite uncertain (32-1100 mol NO per flash). Satellite measurements are a powerful tool to estimate LNOx directly compared to conventional platforms. To apply satellite data in both clean and polluted regions, a new algorithm for calculating LNOx has been developed that uses the Berkeley High-Resolution (BEHR) v3.0B NO2 retrieval algorithm and the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with chemistry (WRF-Chem). LNOx PE over the continental US is estimated using the NO2 product of the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) data and the Earth Networks Total Lightning Network (ENTLN) data. Focusing on the summer season during 2014, we find that the lightning NO2 (LNO2) PE is 32 +/- 15 mol NO2 per flash and 6 +/- 3 mol NO2 per stroke while LNOx PE is 90 +/- 50 mol NOx per flash and 17 +/- 10 mol NOx per stroke. Results reveal that our method reduces the sensitivity to the background NO2 and includes much of the below-cloud LNO2. As the LNOx parameterization varies in studies, the sensitivity of our calculations to the setting of the amount of lightning NO (LNO) is evaluated. Careful consideration of the ratio of LNO2 to NO2 is also needed, given its large influence on the estimation of LNO2 PE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available