4.2 Review

Standard methods for Apis mellifera royal jelly research

Journal

JOURNAL OF APICULTURAL RESEARCH
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00218839.2017.1286003

Keywords

royal jelly; production; storage; protein; sugar; lipid; residue

Categories

Funding

  1. COST Action [FA0803]
  2. EU
  3. EC Grant Agreement
  4. Ricola Foundation - Nature Culture
  5. Ministry of Agriculture of China [CARS-45]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31050006]
  7. Japan Royal Jelly Co., Ltd. Tokyo, Japan
  8. France Agrimer (French Agriculture ministry)
  9. GPGR: French association of royal jelly producers
  10. COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Royal jelly, a honey bee secretion, plays a critical role in caste determination in honey bees because it serves as the source of nutrition for young larvae destined to become queens. It is also fed to adult queens. Royal jelly possesses numerous functional properties and thus has been used as a medication, health food, and cosmetic in many countries. In this paper, we first introduce a traditional method for producing royal jelly by artificial larvae grafting and a newly developed method that does not require grafting of larvae. We describe protocols for the storage and freeze-drying of royal jelly to preserve its biological properties. Routine methods for determination of two important quality criteria, water content and trans-10-hydroxy-2-decenoic acid content, are outlined. On a dry basis, protein, carbohydrate, and fatty acids were found to be the 3 most abundant components of royal jelly. Methods for their isolation, identification, and quantification are described. Because royal jelly is susceptible to contamination with veterinary drugs and acaricides, we also describe methods for detection and quantification of some veterinary drugs and acaricides in royal jelly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available