4.7 Article

A Low-Rank Tensor Dictionary Learning Method for Hyperspectral Image Denoising

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages 1168-1180

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2020.2971441

Keywords

Low-rank tensor; dictionary learning; denoising

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation ofChina [61671046, 61911530216, 61671382, U1834210]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [4182050]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and Safety of Beijing Jiaotong University [RCS2018ZZ002]
  4. NSFC Outstanding Youth Foundation [61725101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As a 3-order tensor, a hyperspectral image (HSI) has dozens of spectral bands, which can deliver more information of real scenes. However, real HSIs are often corrupted by noises in the sensing process, which deteriorates the performance of higher-level detection tasks. In this paper, we propose a Low-rank Tensor Dictionary Learning (LTDL) method for HSI denoising. Differing to existing low-rank based methods, we consider a nearly low-rank approximation, which is closer to the latent low-rank structure of the clean groups of real HSIs. Furthermore, the proposed method benefits from multitask learning gain by learning a spatial dictionary and a spectral dictionary shared among different tensor groups. While most existing work usually consider sparse representations, we exploit a simultaneously sparse and low-rank tensor representation model to enhance the capability of dictionary learning, which is inspired from the observation of the low rank structure in HSI tensor groups. Experiments on synthetic data validate the effectiveness of dictionary learning by the LTDL. Experiments on real HSIs demonstrate the superior denoising performance of the proposed method both visually and quantitatively as compared with state-of-the-art methods along this line of research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available