4.6 Article

Tree-Structured Regional CNN-LSTM Model for Dimensional Sentiment Analysis

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TASLP.2019.2959251

Keywords

Dimensional sentiment analysis; valence-arousal prediction; regional CNN-LSTM model; structured parsing

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation ofChina [61702443, 61966038, 61762091]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, ROC [MOST 107-2628-E-155-002-MY3, MOST 107-2218-E-006-008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dimensional sentiment analysis aims to recognize continuous numerical values in multiple dimensions such as the valence-arousal (VA) space. Compared to the categorical approach that focuses on sentiment classification such as binary classification (i.e., positive and negative), the dimensional approach can provide a more fine-grained sentiment analysis. This article proposes a tree-structured regional CNN-LSTM model consisting of two parts: regional CNN and LSTM to predict the VA ratings of texts. Unlike a conventional CNN which considers a whole text as input, the proposed regional CNN uses a part of the text as a region, dividing an input text into several regions such that the useful affective information in each region can be extracted and weighted according to their contribution to the VA prediction. Such regional information is sequentially integrated across regions using LSTM for VA prediction. By combining the regional CNN and LSTM, both local (regional) information within sentences and long-distance dependencies across sentences can be considered in the prediction process. To further improve performance, a region division strategy is proposed to discover task-relevant phrases and clauses to incorporate structured information into VA prediction. Experimental results on different corpora show that the proposed method outperforms lexicon-, regression-, conventional NN and other structured NN methods proposed in previous studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available