4.6 Article

Ru/g-C3N4as an efficient catalyst for selective hydrogenation of aromatic diamines to alicyclic diamines

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 10, Issue 28, Pages 16515-16525

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ra00836b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Transformational Technologies for Clean Energy and Demonstration, Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA 21030600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21576272]
  3. Science and Technology Service Network Initiative, Chinese Academy of Sciences [KFJ-STS-QYZD-138]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of Ru/g-C(3)N(4)materials with highly dispersed Ru were firstly prepared by an ultrasonic impregnation method using carbon nitride as a support. The catalysts were characterized by various techniques including BET and elemental analysis, ICP-AES, XPS, XRD, CO2-TPD and TEM. The results demonstrated that Ru/g-C(3)N(4)materials with a mesoporous structure and highly dispersed Ru were successfully prepared. The chemo-selective hydrogenation ofp-phenylenediamine (PPDA) to 1,4-cyclohexanediamine (CHDA) over Ru/g-C(3)N(4)as a model reaction was investigated in detail. PPDA conversion of 100% with a CHDA selectivity of more than 86% could be achieved under mild conditions. It can be inferred that the carbon nitride support possessed abundant basic sites and the Ru/g-C3N4-Tcatalysts provided suitable basicity for the aromatic ring hydrogenation. Compared to the N-free Ru/C catalyst, the involvement of nitrogen species in Ru/g-C(3)N(4)remarkably improved the catalytic performance. In addition, the recyclability of the catalyst demonstrated that the aggregation of Ru nanoparticles was responsible for the decrease of the catalytic activity. Furthermore, this strategy also could be expanded to the selective hydrogenation of other aromatic diamines to alicyclic diamines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available