4.7 Article

Inter-calibration of a proposed new primary reference standard AA-ETH Zn for zinc isotopic analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 415-419

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ja00282j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NERC [NE/L004968/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. STFC [ST/J001260/1, ST/N000803/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [1650466, NE/L004968/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J001260/1, ST/N000803/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26610182, 15H01727] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have prepared a large volume of pure, concentrated and homogenous zinc standard solution. This new standard solution is intended to be used as a primary reference standard for the zinc isotope community, and to serve as a replacement for the nearly exhausted current reference standard, the so-called JMC-Lyon Zn. The isotopic composition of this new zinc standard (AA-ETH Zn) has been determined through an inter-laboratory calibration exercise, calibrated against the existing JMC-Lyon standard, as well as the certified Zn reference standard IRMM-3702. The data show that the new standard is isotopically indistinguishable from the IRMM-3702 zinc standard, with a weighted delta Zn-66/64 value of 0.28 +/- 0.02& relative to JMC-Lyon. We suggest that this new standard be assigned a delta Zn-66/64 value of +0.28 parts per thousand for reporting of future Zn isotope data, with the rationale that all existing published Zn isotope data are presented relative to the JMC-Lyon standard. Therefore our proposed presentation allows for a direct comparison with all previously published data, and that are directly traceable to a certified reference standard, IRMM-3702 Zn. This standard will be made freely available to all interested labs through contact with the corresponding author.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available