4.6 Article

Biological control of S-nitrosothiol reactivity: potential role of sigma-hole interactions

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages 6595-6605

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9cp06377c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER award [CHE-1255641]
  2. Marquette University Way-Klinger Sabbatical Award
  3. NSF [ACI-1053575]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

S-Nitrosothiols (RSNOs) are ubiquitous biomolecules whose chemistry is tightly controlled in vivo, although the specific molecular mechanisms behind this biological control remain unknown. In this work, we demonstrate, using high-level ab initio and DFT calculations, the ability of RSNOs to participate in intermolecular interactions with electron pair donors/Lewis bases (LBs) via a sigma-hole, a region of positive electrostatic potential on the molecular surface at the extension of the N-S bond. Importantly, sigma-hole binding is able to modulate the properties of RSNOs by changing the balance between two chemically opposite (antagonistic) resonance components, R-S-1=N-O- (D) and R-S-/NO+ (I), which are, in addition to the main resonance structure R-S-N=O, necessary to describe the unusual electronic structure of RSNOs. sigma-Hole binding at the sulfur atom of RSNO promotes the resonance structure D and reduces the resonance structure I, thereby stabilizing the weak N-S bond and making the sulfur atom more electrophilic. On the other hand, increasing the D-character of RSNO by other means (e.g. via N- or O-coordination of a Lewis acid) in turn enhances the sigma-hole bonding. Our calculations suggest that in the protein environment a combination of sigma-hole bonding of a negatively charged amino acid sidechain at the sulfur atom and N- or O-coordination of a positively charged amino acid sidechain is expected to have a profound effect on the RSNO electronic structure and reactivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available