4.5 Article

Cortical Thickness and Depressive Symptoms in Cognitively Normal Individuals: The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages 1273-1281

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-170041

Keywords

Aging; cortical thickness; depression; depressive symptoms; magnetic resonance imaging

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [K01 MH068351]
  2. National Institute on Aging [U01 AG006786, K01 AG028573, R01AG034676]
  3. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  4. Clarice Smith and Abigail Van Buren Alzheimer's Disease Research Program
  5. National Program of Sustainability II [LQ1605]
  6. Edli Foundation
  7. Arizona Alzheimer's Consortium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Altered cortical thickness has been observed in aging and various neurodegenerative disorders. Furthermore, reduced hippocampal volume has been reported in late-life depression. Even mild depressive symptoms are common in the elderly. However, little is known about the structural MRI measures of depressive symptoms in normal cognitive aging. Thus we sought to examine the association between depressive symptoms with cortical thickness and hippocampal volume as measured by brain MRI among community-dwelling participants. We conducted a cross-sectional study derived from the ongoing population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, involving cognitively normal participants (N = 1,507) aged >= 70 years. We observed that depressive symptoms were associated with lower global cortical thickness and lower thickness in specific prefrontal and temporal cortical regions, labeled by FreeSurfer software, version 5.3. As expected, the strength of correlation was very small, given that participants were community-dwelling with only mild depressive symptoms. We did not observe associations between hippocampal volume and depressive symptoms. These findings may provide insight into the structural correlates of mild depressive symptoms in elderly participants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available